|
|
|
Representative Ro Foege
Report from the Iowa Legislature
February 20, 2005
The Meth Problem in IowaThe primary
topics of conversation last week at the Capital had to do with two
drugs—methamphetamine and tobacco. The first is an illegal drug that is
being produced in makeshift labs in Iowa, and the other is a legal drug that
is driving up the costs of health care. Most readers know of my work in the
area of tobacco prevention and cessation, so I will focus my comments on the meth problem in Iowa.
For several years, legislators and law enforcement officials have been
trying to find a way to shut down the growing number of meth labs in Iowa.
2004 figures indicate that law enforcement dealt with over 1,450 labs
throughout the state. Iowa ranks third in the nation in the number of meth
labs discovered. This is a problem state-wide, since at least one meth lab
has been found in every county in Iowa.
On average, state and local law enforcement deal with 26 meth labs per week
or about 4 per day. This is dangerous for those risking their lives to clean
up the lab, but it is also expensive, costing about $2,000 in toxic waste
disposal and another $1,000 in law enforcement costs.
These numbers do not begin to tabulate the health costs to children and
others who live near these labs, or the danger that neighbors face when a
lab explodes in their apartment building or on their street. And, these
numbers neither account for the costs of prosecuting meth producers and
sellers nor does it calculate the costs of imprisonment of the convicted or
the cost of foster care for the children in those families.
In Carroll County, an infant nearly died from being given a baby bottle
filled with meth making chemicals. In Mason City a little girl was found in
a family car, seated next to bubbling vapors from anhydrous ammonia used to
make meth. In the last three years almost 1,000 children were classified as
victims of abuse by the Department of Human Services due to meth production
in their homes.
Last year the State of Oklahoma decided to classify one of the ingredients
in meth—pseudoephedrine--a Schedule V drug. Pseudoephedrine (PSE) is a key
ingredient in many cold medications. Making it a Schedule V drug means that
those products which contain it would be taken off the shelves and could
only be sold in pharmacies. Purchase of the products would require a picture
ID and a signature. It worked so well in Oklahoma that the number of meth
labs dropped by about 50 %.
The opposition to adopting this strategy in Iowa comes primarily from
convenience stores and some grocers, who argue that families in rural areas
need someplace to go at night if a child needs cough or cold medicine. The
good news is that there are many cough and cold medications that can be
purchased over-the-counter that do not contain PSE. I received a list that
contained 115 over-the-counter cold and cough medications that do not
contain PSE. And, pharmaceutical companies are developing alternatives to
PSE. It is my hope that the Legislature can find a way to reduce meth labs
in Iowa without hurting local convenience stores or grocery stores.
Unfortunately, restricting the purchase of medications with PSE will not
eliminate meth use in Iowa, because this is only one piece of the problem.
It does not address the fact that about 80% of methamphetamine is made south
of the border and transported into our state. However, if we can reduce the
number of meth labs in Iowa, we may be able to protect our children and
neighbors from the effects of these dangerous labs.
I look forward to hearing from constituents about the work of the Iowa
Legislature.
You can write me at the State Capitol, Des Moines, IA 50319; call me at
515/281-7328 or e-mail me at
ro.foege@legis.state.ia.us.
Ro
|